Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Blaise Bicknell vs James Tracy Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bicknell vs Tracy analysis and find out who is favored!
Blaise Bicknell vs James Tracy Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bicknell 1 - 0 Tracy
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bicknell has won 48.9% of points on his second serve, while Tracy has won 62.03%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bicknell, in recent form, has won 50.89% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tracy has won 54.05%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.52% and 37.06% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bicknell has saved 57.59% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tracy has saved 73.91% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bicknell has won 61.76% of matches played (W/L 42/ 26), with Tracy winning 70% (W/L 14/ 6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bicknell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 57/ 34), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Tracy has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 17/ 7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Bicknell has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.14% of matches (W/L 25/ 18), where as Tracy has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 84.62% of matches (W/L 11/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bicknell winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Bicknell winning 2 and Tracy winning 1. The last match between Bicknell and Tracy was at the M25 Laval, 16-07-2023, Final, Hard with Blaise Bicknell getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:21:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bicknell and Tracy have played a deciding set 1 times, with Bicknell winning 1 times and Tracy 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bicknell winning 0, and Tracy 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bicknell has played against opponents with an average rank of 225.74 while Tracy has played against players with an average rank of 231.1.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bicknell has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tracy has won 80% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bicknell has converted 43.15% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tracy has converted 40.91% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bicknell 1 - 0 Tracy
309
Rank
309
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
679
Rank
668
High
21
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
59% (93-65)
Career Total W/L
63% (26-15)
44% (8-10)
YTD W/L
67% (2-1)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Blaise Bicknell | James Tracy |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 11 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:21:0 | 2:21:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (62/96) | 56% (49/88) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (38/62) | 61% (30/49) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 62% (21/34) | 56% (22/39) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 23% (3/13) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (36/88) | 39% (37/96) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Blaise Bicknell
Player
James Tracy
65%
(
62 of
96)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
88)
11
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Blaise Bicknell | James Tracy |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 44% (8/10) | 67% (2/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (20/20) | 57% (4/3) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (188/192) | 54% (36/31) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) | 67% (2/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.32 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 60 | 2 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 53 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 2:2:5 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 271.22 | 461.33 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (818/1221) | 65% (149/228) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (545/818) | 61% (91/149) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (197/403) | 62% (49/79) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (49/116) | 41% (9/22) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (475/1222) | 42% (103/244) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (7/7) | 67% (2/1) |
| Futures W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (7/15) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 20% (1/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 64% (11/7) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 36% (11/4) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 50% (2/1) |
Blaise Bicknell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Miles Jones
Player
Blaise Bicknell
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
0
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
7
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Blaise Bicknell
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
74%
(
51 of
69)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Blaise Bicknell
Player
Boris Kozlov
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Blaise Bicknell
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
113)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
43 of
72)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
56 of
113)
100
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bor Artnak
Player
Blaise Bicknell
56%
(
10 of
18)
1st Serve %
32%
(
6 of
19)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
90%
(
9 of
10)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
2 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
28
Total Points Won
9
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Blaise Bicknell
56%
(
55 of
98)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
7
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
6
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
35 of
44)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
37 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Blaise Bicknell
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
10
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
0
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
17 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valerio Aboian
Player
Blaise Bicknell
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Blaise Bicknell
Player
Benjamin Torrealba
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
71 of
106)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
41 of
71)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
50 of
106)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Blaise Bicknell
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
73%
(
71 of
97)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
97)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
James Tracy Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Handel
Player
James Tracy
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Tracy
Player
Noah Rubin
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
78%
(
83 of
106)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
52 of
83)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
29 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(5) 6-4 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Tracy
Player
Darian King
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vasek Pospisil
Player
James Tracy
55%
(
51 of
92)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
4
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
1
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
14 of
46)
70
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Tracy
Player
Justin Boulais
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
James Tracy
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Sebastian Gomez
Player
James Tracy
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
84)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Blaise Bicknell
Player
James Tracy
65%
(
62 of
96)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
88)
11
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
James Tracy
Player
Leo Vithoontien
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
58 of
81)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Tracy
Player
Jaden Weekes
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Bicknell Vs Tracy Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
